This interview was conducted by NTD News/The Epoch Times on Friday, June, 19…
U.S. policymakers need to come up with a better space strategy, warned a space and security expert after China sent a three-member crew to its unfinished space station on Thursday.
“To fight and win a space war against the Americans, the first thing that [the Chinese regime] will do is to knock out or blind our satellites in a space Pearl Harbor-type event,” Brandon Weichert, author of “Winning Space: How America Remains a Superpower” said in an interview with NTD on June 19.
He added, “We are not yet prepared to defend ourselves, let alone retaliate, in the way that would deter China or Russia from trying this during a geopolitical crisis.”
The agency in charge of China’s manned space program, the China Manned Space Engineering Office (CMSEO), is not a civilian agency like NASA. CMSEO is subordinate to China’s Central Military Commission (CMC), an agency of the Chinese Communist Party that oversees the Chinese military.
Currently, CMSEO is currently headed by Hao Chun, but the country’s manned space program is commanded by Gen. Li Shangfu, who is also a department director at the CMC.
Underscoring how the Chinese manned space program is inseparable from the Chinese military is the fact that the three crew members—Nie Haisheng, Liu Boming, and Tang Hongbo—are former air force pilots of the Chinese military, formally known as the People’s Liberation Army.
The three members will stay in the station’s main living module for three months, the longest stay for any Chinese nationals in space since Beijing launched an astronaut into Earth orbit in 2003. The Chinese space station, named Tiangong, will receive additional modules in 2022.
The International Space Station (ISS), launched in 1998, is a partnership between the United States, Canada, Japan, Russia, and member nations of the European Space Agency. China has been barred from taking part in the ISS since 2011 when the United States passed a law banning space cooperation between NASA and Chinese organizations, due to national security concerns.
China’s own actions also spurred distrust leading to its ban from the ISS. In January 2007, China fired an anti-satellite missile against one of its inactive weather satellites, drawing international concern.
Weichert pointed to two Chinese space technologies that could cripple U.S. satellites. Firstly, he said a giant robotic arm—10 meters in length, which can lift objects weighing up to 20 tons, according to Chinese state-run media—is attached to the Chinese space station and poses a serious threat.
“So China in peacetime could use that grappling arm to help ships dock. But in wartime, they could use that to pluck our satellites from nearby orbits and push them out of orbit or sabotage them,” Weichert said.
In April, Army Gen. James Dickinson, commander of the U.S. Space Command, told a Senate hearing (pdf) that China’s robotic arm technology in space “could be used in a future system for grappling other satellites.”
The second Chinese technology that poses a threat to U.S. satellites is lasers, according to Weichert.
“China planners have talked about installing a large laser when their [space] station is completed in orbit. Now they say in peacetime, the laser would be used to clear orbital debris. But in wartime, that laser could potentially be used to blind sensitive American satellites in orbit,” Weichert said.
In 2018, researchers at China’s Air Force Engineering University published a paper proposing how a giant laser would be effective to clean space junk and old satellites.
Satellite communication is not only critical for Washington to effectively deploy its forces, but it is also vital for the U.S. economy. Weichert explained that the United States would see its economy sent back to the “pre-1970s era” without satellites, given most modern electronic transactions, such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), rely on them.
More importantly, China is gaining on the U.S. leadership in space, according to Weichert.
“They’re [China] still behind us. But rather than being 18 years behind us, 20 years behind us, they’re only about six or seven years behind us now,” he said.
Currently, U.S. policymakers are “too small-minded” with regard to their space policies, Weichert said, and they need to “develop systems and doctrines” not just to defend U.S. satellites but also U.S. commercial interests in the future.
From The Epoch Times
Be sure to secure your copy of WINNING SPACE: HOW AMERICA REMAINS A SUPERPOWER TODAY!